Investors Rush to Close JPMorgan Accounts Over Alleged Attack on Bitcoin and MSTR Shareholders

A new battle line has been drawn between traditional banking and the Bitcoin community, and this time JPMorgan is at the center of the storm. After the bank’s analysts warned that MicroStrategy (MSTR) could be removed from major stock indices because of its huge Bitcoin holdings, thousands of crypto-leaning customers now claim they are closing their accounts in protest. On social media, the move is being framed as a response to a “planned attack on Bitcoin and MSTR shareholders.”

MicroStrategy has spent the past several years transforming itself from a conventional software company into one of the largest corporate holders of Bitcoin in the world. Its stock has become a favorite among Bitcoin believers, who see it as a leveraged way to gain exposure to BTC. That is exactly why JPMorgan’s recent research note hit such a nerve. The bank highlighted that index provider MSCI is reviewing whether to exclude companies whose balance sheets are dominated by digital assets, which could push MicroStrategy out of key indices and trigger billions of dollars in forced selling by index-tracking funds.

For many in the Bitcoin community, this does not look like neutral analysis. Commentators have stitched together a timeline of events: growing short interest in MSTR, tighter margin rules for traders, and now a high-profile warning that index removal could be coming. In their view, all of this forms part of an orchestrated campaign to punish companies that embrace Bitcoin as a treasury asset and to scare off other CEOs from following the same path.

The reaction online has been fast and emotional. Posts under boycott-themed hashtags show screenshots of customers closing personal and business accounts at JPMorgan, encouraging others to “pull liquidity” from the bank and move into Bitcoin, MicroStrategy stock, or more crypto-friendly institutions. Although these numbers are difficult to verify from the outside, the narrative of a mass exit from JPMorgan has already taken hold inside crypto circles.

High-profile voices have amplified the anger. Prominent Bitcoin advocates and influencers have urged followers to “crash JPMorgan” by withdrawing funds and refusing to use its services. Some wealthy individuals claim to have moved large sums out of the bank in direct response to the MicroStrategy note, portraying it as a way to defend Bitcoin and send a message to Wall Street: if you attack our assets, we will take our business elsewhere.

This controversy also lands in the middle of a broader debate over so-called “debanking” of crypto businesses and personalities. Recent reports that the accounts of Strike’s chief executive, a well-known Bitcoin payments entrepreneur, were abruptly closed by JPMorgan have deepened the sense of mistrust. To many in the Bitcoin community, such cases confirm their suspicion that big banks are willing to cut ties with crypto-aligned clients whenever regulatory, political, or reputational pressures rise.

From JPMorgan’s side, the situation can be framed very differently. Large banks have to manage regulatory risk, anti-money-laundering rules, and index-related concerns that are far more complex than the average retail customer sees. Analysts who flag potential index exclusions or volatility risks argue that they are simply doing their job for institutional clients, not waging ideological war on Bitcoin.

The reality probably sits somewhere between these perspectives. JPMorgan is deeply involved in the broader digital-asset ecosystem, from serving institutional investors who trade crypto products to providing infrastructure that indirectly touches Bitcoin markets. At the same time, its top leadership has a long history of criticizing Bitcoin as speculative or even worthless. That tension helps explain why any negative comment from the bank about Bitcoin-centric companies is instantly interpreted as hostile.

What happens next matters for both sides. If index providers move ahead with excluding MicroStrategy and similar “digital asset treasury” firms from major benchmarks, there could indeed be significant outflows from passive funds, more volatility in MSTR shares, and fresh questions over whether a Bitcoin-heavy corporate strategy is compatible with mainstream capital markets. If, on the other hand, the boycott narrative grows beyond social media and a measurable number of clients actually leave JPMorgan, the bank could face both reputational damage and the risk of pushing even more activity toward crypto-native platforms.

For now, what is clear is sentiment. A large portion of the Bitcoin community believes JPMorgan has crossed a line from cautious analysis into open hostility toward Bitcoin and its investors. Whether or not that is fair, those beliefs are already driving behavior — and turning one research note into a full-blown showdown between old finance and the new digital-asset economy.

Popular posts from this blog

AppLovin: The Adtech Engine Powering App Monetization — and a 9-Bagger in Four Years

Image
AppLovin has grown from a mobile marketing toolkit into a full-stack adtech platform that helps developers turn audiences into sustainable revenue. Its value proposition is straightforward: match advertiser demand with the right users at the right moment, then measure what works and scale it automatically. For app businesses balancing user acquisition, monetization, and compliance, that combination is powerful. At the heart of AppLovin’s platform is a performance engine that ingests real-time signals from countless impressions, clicks, installs, and in-app events. Using machine-learning models, it predicts the likelihood that a specific user will take a profitable action—whether that is an in-app purchase, a subscription renewal, or simply high-quality engagement that produces meaningful ad revenue. Marketers set a return-on-ad-spend target, and the system continuously allocates budget to the channels, geos, and creatives most likely to hit it. As more data flows through the system, t...
Read more

Trump Vows to Keep the U.S. No. 1 in Crypto as China Ramps Up Its Push

Image
For months, President Donald Trump has positioned digital assets as a pillar of American economic strategy. That theme sharpened again in early November, when he declared that the United States “must stay number one” in crypto as China steps up its involvement. Framed as a competition for technological leadership, the message is clear: blockchain and digital finance are now part of a broader race for economic influence and standards-setting power. The administration’s stance blends rhetorical urgency with concrete moves. In January, a sweeping order directed agencies to promote responsible growth of digital assets, protect self-custody, encourage lawful access to banking, and coordinate clearer, technology-neutral rules. Crucially, it barred a retail central bank digital currency, arguing that the dollar’s global role is better advanced through private-sector innovation—especially stablecoins—than through a government-issued token for the public. In March, the White House moved to tr...
Read more

CME Sees 91.9% Odds of a 0.25% Fed Rate Cut in October

Image
Markets are now pricing in a 91.9% probability that the Federal Reserve will trim its policy rate by 25 basis points in October, according to CME-derived odds. The shift signals investor confidence that cooling inflation and softer growth data warrant additional easing after a long tightening cycle. In rates, the most immediate impact is likely along the front end of the Treasury curve. Futures imply lower short-term yields as traders anticipate cheaper funding costs, while the longer end could remain more anchored by growth expectations and term premium dynamics. A modest bull-steepening is possible if investors pair rate-cut bets with concern about future expansion. For equities, the setup typically favors rate-sensitive groups. Real estate and utilities often benefit from declining discount rates, while small caps—burdened by higher interest expenses—can see relief. Growth stocks may also catch a bid as lower yields support higher present values of future cash flows, though leader...
Read more

OKX Review 2025: Fees, Features, Security, and How to Sign Up (Step-by-Step)

Image
OKX is a feature-packed crypto exchange offering spot, margin, futures, options, copy trading, and a powerful Web3 wallet. Fees for regular users typically start around 0.08% maker / 0.10% taker on spot and 0.02% / 0.05% on futures, with tiered discounts for higher volumes. OKX publishes Proof-of-Reserves (Merkle tree + zk verification) so users can verify holdings. However, 2025 brought regulatory headlines (a U.S. AML case and a compliance monitor), so users should weigh the pros against jurisdictional constraints. Fast signup: Create your OKX account Pros and Cons Pros Broad product lineup: spot, margin, perpetuals, options, Convert/RFQ, copy trading, Earn, and Web3 wallet. Competitive fees with tiering for VIP/high-volume traders. Public Proof-of-Reserves with Merkle tree and zk-STARK verification. Web3 wallet: multi-chain access, DEX, NFTs, DeFi aggregation. OKX Pay expansions in select regions. Cons Regulatory overhang in 2025 (AML case; external monitor through...
Read more

Warning! BTC Faces a Potential Downtrend After the Violent Sell-Off on October 10

Image
The cryptocurrency market was shaken on October 10 when Bitcoin (BTC) experienced an unexpected and aggressive sell-off, erasing billions in market value within hours. The abrupt drop caught many traders off guard, marking one of the most volatile movements of the quarter. As BTC attempts to recover, analysts warn that the market could be entering a critical phase — one that might determine whether Bitcoin’s medium-term trend turns decisively bearish. The October 10 Shock On October 10, Bitcoin’s price plunged sharply after weeks of relative stability. The decline was triggered by a combination of factors, including sudden whale movements, profit-taking by large holders, and macroeconomic fears surrounding global liquidity. Within a few hours, BTC broke below several key support levels, triggering a wave of liquidations in leveraged positions. This event not only rattled short-term traders but also weakened investor confidence in the ongoing uptrend that had been forming since early...
Read more